|
October 26, 2002
The iPod Killer?
Why lug around gigs of expensive portable storage space when the music lives at your house, or on rented Web server space? Why hassle with multiple copies of your music, one on each device and computer that you use, when that music can live in one place? Brad Lauster's recent blog entry got me fired up about this. Someday people will store their music and other files centrally and use them via multiple devices in multiple places; that's almost a given. But don't we have what it takes to make that someday today? Don't plenty of people who regularly listen to mp3s have devices that can support such a system? Someone just needs to build device-based client software that allows folks to choose and stream down their songs, and the corresponding server software that talks to the device and serves up the chosen songs from the PC back home. So what do you think -- is the bandwidth cheap enough to make this sort of streaming practical yet? Certainly during weekends, when minutes are free, no? Shoutcast streams mp3s effectively from PC to PC, even over modem connections, so I think we already have sufficient bandwidth. The device-side UI would be quite a challenge, but what a great capability this would provide... More power to you: Here's how the software would identify the song based on just a sample: it would query the online CDDB database, which contains titles of thousands of songs along with unique checksum signatures for each song. A special algorithm allows software to quickly scan any mp3 and come up with a unique "checksum" or signature, which applies to that song and that song only. So if you have an untitled mp3 on your PC, you can scan it and submit the resulting signature to the CDDB database. The database will spit back the name of the song, if it recognizes it. (I know: the ambient noise would probably screw up the whole scheme, and the checksums in that database probably require -entire- tracks, but can't a guy dream?) I can hardly wait. [ASCAP and RIAA attorneys: I'm not encouraging anyone to download any music that they haven't purchased. I'm not seeking financial profit from any of this. And I don't have any money. So stay off my back.] - Sean
Posted by sean at October 26, 2002 05:41 PM
| TrackBack (0)
Comments
Sean - thanks for doing some more thinking on this! A while ago a couple friends and I started getting together to work on a joint design project - not job related, but just something fun. Thing is, we like screwing around more than we liked the product ideas we came up with, so the work never happened. This seems like an interesting enough project though...you interested in doing a little collaborating with me? Maybe we can come up with some product sketches - maybe even a prototype, if we're really ambitious? Posted by: Brad Lauster on October 30, 2002 02:03 PMBrad: This is a great idea and I'd love to help you bring it to the public. A disclaimer: between now and New Year's I'll be very busy with grad Given that, I'd love to work on this as time will allow over the next We can start, like you said, by hashing out the idea. We can summarize the -Sean Posted by: Sean on October 30, 2002 04:20 PM
Congrats Posted by: Tiago Henriques on November 4, 2002 04:15 AMHere's proof that the song-identification feature is possible. The new Neuros digital audio device comes with a built-in FM radio and a feature that will record a 30-second segment of any song on the radio. Back at the desktop, Neuros' "digital fingerprint" feature connects to a Neuros database and provides the song title and artist. Details:
Posted by: on November 17, 2002 01:05 AM
Great Site Post a comment
|