May 11, 2003
Language, Dolphins and Garage Cinema
dolphin as projector?

What if dolphins communicate by sending and receiving images? What if humans can learn to do the same, on the fly, via computer mediation?

I know what you're thinking: this guy's been in California far too long. You're probably right.

But bear with me on this.

As a kid growing up by the sea in Florida I was obsessed with bottlenose dolphins. I read everything I could find about them. When I was 13 I borrowed a fancy underwater microphone from an oceanographer and used it to record dolphin sounds at Ocean World, the local marine theme park. I played back the recordings into another dolphin tank. But I didn't get much of a reaction at all. After gathering around this strange noise-making machine for a few minutes, the dolphins quickly grew bored and ignored the tape recorder. They were far more interested in my cheap watch. And dead fish.

Plenty of more serious research (and writing and movie-making) was devoted to the prospect that dolphins' clicks and whistles might be a language. Scientists showed that dolphins convey instructions to one another, but still nobody has proven whether a high-level dolphin language exists.

This week I read a paper by Berkeley's Professor Marc Davis that dramatically changed my thinking about this by pointing out that a dolphin language might not be based on words. Most linguistic dolphin research I've seen seeks dolphin sounds strung together as words, and I always unconsciously assumed that any high-level language must be based on words.

yukaghir love letterBut Davis points out in his paper that some written human languages don't use words at all but instead directly represent meaning visually. The image to the right is a message written in such a language, by a member of the Yukaghir tribe in Siberia. (See Davis' paper for more details and a translation of the letter.)

Like bats, dolphins use echolocation. They emit waves of sound and use the resulting echoes to pinpoint locations, sizes, shapes, densities, and even internal states and structures of animals and objects, with astounding precision and accuracy. If dolphins use their own sounds so skillfully to probe their environments and to "see" what's around them, can they also use sound to create artificial imagery that's "visible" to other dolphins?

Dolphins exhibit a superhuman ability to convey spatial instructions to one another. Nobody's sure how exactly they work this out, but if you watch a group of dolphins carrying out tasks in which they have to quickly synchronize very complicated sets of movements -- during a theme-park performance, for example, or during hunts in which they round up thousands of fish into dense schools -- you'll be amazed at their powers of spatial coordination.

Can you imagine dolphins sending each other visual cues mapped to real-world environments -- or even sending entire artificial "video" scenes showing planned activities -- on the fly?

This may be a stretch; it's probably fiction and so far it's not backed by much science. But it's a very powerful idea that we can use. Even if dolphins cannot communicate this way, perhaps we will be able to, with the help of computers.

Davis and his Garage Cinema Research group at Berkeley are working on it. They're designing systems that they hope will allow regular people to easily and quickly build video compositions, without putting forth the tremendous amount of time, expense and technical knowledge necessary for today's film production. Thanks to smart systems that can recognize media assets and automate much of the video capture, editing and production process, Davis hopes to allow us all to "write" video as often and as easily as we "read" video today. The promise lies not just in replacing the current wasteful and corporate-dominated system of creating polished high-end feature films, but in providing humanity with a new, more powerful form of everyday communication.

Posted by sean at May 11, 2003 06:32 PM | TrackBack (0)
Comments

Hmmm... facinating! I guess the thinking would run then (maybe, I am no science boy) that dolphin 'chatter' is really a code - like '1010101010' that is used to make representational images? Almost like coding a .jpeg? Great post!

Chris

Posted by: Chris G. on May 22, 2003 11:06 PM

Yes and no. I would assume they -don't- use digital "codes." Their experience of echolocation is probably more similar to our experience of eyesight; it's analog, not a computation of 1s and 0s but an experience involving the brain's interpretation and filtering of shapes and forms and movement, which it gathers through the combined sensations of millions of cones and rods in the eye. But who knows, this is conjecture.

Posted by: sean on May 23, 2003 08:50 AM

I like the idea of garage cinema, but as for dolphin language, it's important not to confuse language with communication, or language with writing. Davis is contrasting semasiographic and glottographic writing systems, but neither of those is something a baby would acquire as a language. So I don't think one can say that "there are written human languages that don't use words at all". Like all human languages, the Yukaghir language uses words, even if their writing system doesn't.

As for communicating via pictures, Greg Bear postulates the "pictor" device in his SF novel "Eon" (and sequels). It's a small device worn around the neck that lets people communicate visually, with holographic projections. It's supposedly much faster and richer than normal speech, but I don't buy it. For communicating the majority of what humans communicate about, there's nothing more efficient than speech. Certainly, it would often be handy to be able to project visual props to talk *about*, but again, that's not language per se.

Anyway, I came across this strange little presentation that riffs on future communication systems that may interest you.

Posted by: John on June 17, 2003 04:06 PM

John:

Thanks for your thoughtful comment!

Whether a “writing system” equals a “written human language” is a matter of definitions. I’m definitely no linguist and I’m sure technically my vocabulary in this realm is atrocious; I apologize for any such mistakes. But whatever you call it, the concept of a system that allows rapid, spontaneous, visual communication of deep, complex concepts without the use of words really gets my blood pumping.

Thanks also for the Greg Bear tip. I’ve just recently been getting into his fiction so now “Eon” is high on my to-read list. I’ll check out the link too.

Posted by: sean on June 17, 2003 04:27 PM

Eon's a great read, even if it's imagined geopolitical situation is pretty dated (the US and USSR are on the brink of nuclear war). The Forge of God is another great Bear novel. I think his earlier stuff is much better than more recent books.

As for linguistics, The Language Instinct by Stephen Pinker is a great overview of the field. And The Atoms of Language, by Mark Baker, is a really interesting comparison of the rules that seem to govern how human languages can differ from one another, although it gets a little technical.

Posted by: John on June 18, 2003 06:06 PM

hello people how are you thats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good

Posted by: on November 18, 2003 07:22 AM

Hi, I am doing a project on dolphins and trying to find out how dolphins communictate? : )

Posted by: Scags on October 20, 2004 07:44 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?